Desktop Linux Forum Index Desktop Linux
A New Linux In Development
 
   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  |  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups Log inLog in   RegisterRegister 

What would you like to see in a desktop distribution?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Desktop Linux Forum Index -> Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SamFisher47
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 193
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:11 am    Post subject: What would you like to see in a desktop distribution? Reply with quote

Pretty much just post here any problems/issues you have had with Ubuntu/openSUSE/Mandriva (or any other desktop user-targed distribution) or any features you think should have been added/modified/updated in the aforementioned distributions.

My issues, for now:
1. Hibernate/Resume/Suspend does not work with some laptops (esp. using Ubuntu)
2. Many codecs not included by default (Ubuntu again, but for valid reasons - free/legality issues, etc.)
3. Bootup quite slow (in general)
4. Menus can be difficult to navigate (openSUSE, too many clicks to open an application!)
5. Java and flash support should be default

So, post what you think!
_________________
--SamFisher47

Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html

Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
master_kernel
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 66

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:10 am    Post subject: Re: What would you like to see in a desktop distribution? Reply with quote

SamFisher47 wrote:
Pretty much just post here any problems/issues you have had with Ubuntu/openSUSE/Mandriva (or any other desktop user-targed distribution) or any features you think should have been added/modified/updated in the aforementioned distributions.

My issues, for now:
1. Hibernate/Resume/Suspend does not work with some laptops (esp. using Ubuntu)
2. Many codecs not included by default (Ubuntu again, but for valid reasons - free/legality issues, etc.)
3. Bootup quite slow (in general)
4. Menus can be difficult to navigate (openSUSE, too many clicks to open an application!)
5. Java and flash support should be default

So, post what you think!


About how fast are we aiming for in bootup times?

Also, do we want to consider using bootsplash with the kernel?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SamFisher47
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 193
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:37 pm    Post subject: Re: What would you like to see in a desktop distribution? Reply with quote

master_kernel wrote:

About how fast are we aiming for in bootup times?

Also, do we want to consider using bootsplash with the kernel?


Actually, I'm not sure Sad. Just a bootup time that is comparable with other operating systems (including other distros), and a suspend/resume feature that works 100% of the time Very Happy
_________________
--SamFisher47

Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html

Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Siberian Fox
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 251
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well Windows has the fastest, I would say we should keep it as far under a minute as possible. I would hope for around 30 - 40 seconds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
master_kernel
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 66

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Siberian Fox wrote:
Well Windows has the fastest, I would say we should keep it as far under a minute as possible. I would hope for around 30 - 40 seconds.


On my AMD X2 system I get around 26 seconds to the login screen with the 2.6.23 kernel, but I'm not sure how i686/i586/i386 does.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Helmetman
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 38

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In Ubuntu when I run a full-screen game in WINE or Cedega my whole pc freezes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SamFisher47
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 193
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Helmetman wrote:
In Ubuntu when I run a full-screen game in WINE or Cedega my whole pc freezes

Interesting... What game are you running, or is it any full-screen game in general? This doesn't seem to happen to me Confused


More about fast boot-up times:
Code:
http://www.improvedsource.com/view.php/Linux-System/3
http://yamz.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/23-second-boot-up-time/


Of course, everything depends on hardware configuration etc but I think by disabling services such as Bluetooth or Braille support for users who don't need it (by asking at installation), we should be able to get a 25-second (or below Razz) boot-up time!


What do you guys think?
_________________
--SamFisher47

Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html

Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Helmetman
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 38

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The games were America's Army, and Counter-Strike:Source. It also freezes when I switch from fullscreen to windowed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Davmont
Beta Developer
Beta Developer


Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 53
Location: Valladolid, Espaņa

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:15 am    Post subject: Re: What would you like to see in a desktop distribution? Reply with quote

master_kernel wrote:
SamFisher47 wrote:
...


About how fast are we aiming for in bootup times?

Also, do we want to consider using bootsplash with the kernel?


i think bootsplash is not going to be supported anymore... you should use splashy instead of it i think

in my opinion bootup time is a priority... my computer uses around 30secs i think (ill use a clock the next time) ... it boots faster than my slooow windows (i have to format it)

things i need on a distro : office suite (openOffice), music Player (amarok in my case; audacious, rythmbox...) codecs and video player : (k)mplayer or vlc... and a packager manager as synaptic or adept-manager...

what kind of packet is the distro going to manage? rpm or .deb???
_________________
Computers are like air conditioners; they stop working properly if you open Windows Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SamFisher47
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 193
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I believe we were thinking about going for .deb but siberianfox also came up with the idea of using both, similar to Xandros. I'm not sure where we stand now. I think it is a choice between .deb or both Smile
_________________
--SamFisher47

Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html

Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Siberian Fox
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 251
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well that was an idea, but if it comes down to it, Gnome will have to use Debs, and KDE will use RPMs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
SamFisher47
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 193
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry about my naivety but why is that? Razz
_________________
--SamFisher47

Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html

Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Siberian Fox
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 251
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gnome is almost founded by debian, and so most of the Gnome products are Debs. KDE however is mainly RPM, but there are more products in RPM format than Debs. You will find that most debs were made specifically for Ubuntu.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
SamFisher47
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 193
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, right, I understand now. Then perhaps (in later releases if it is time-consuming) we can implement the dual package system, so that users of our Gnome distribution can also use/trial the KDE edition without having to re-download or search for their software all over again?
_________________
--SamFisher47

Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html

Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rustybronco
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well that would be wifi that works out of the box, tough thing to get a grasp on.
and video cards that communicate improperly with a monitor to select the correct screen resolution? possibly have a select resolution and refresh rate in the origional install (desktop-distro is using 1440x900@75hz is this highest resolution supported?/ would you like to try a different resolution?)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Desktop Linux Forum Index -> Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum