| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| What do you think about Amarok? |
| Excellent |
|
66% |
[ 4 ] |
| Good |
|
16% |
[ 1 ] |
| Possibly (please post alternatives) |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| There is better (please post below) |
|
16% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 6 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Siberian Fox Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:20 pm Post subject: Music player: Amarok |
|
|
I was thinking of including Amarok in our distribution. I had posted this in the gnome section, but I wanted to go heavily into it here (this is also one of my favorite Linux programs). Amarok can manage Ipods, has Last.fm support, built in Wikipedia, lyrics, visuals, and a site similar to Itunes stores. It also supports radio, user mods, and streams. You can read up on it here. Let me know your thoughts:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amarok_(audio)
Screenshot:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SamFisher47 Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Siberian Fox Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| it won't be hard. All the images come in their own folder, and are fully replaceable. I'm on Opensuse now, and they have added their logo to it, so it is rather easy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SamFisher47 Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Would you be able to edit the post to look like the post here for Transmission?
| Code: | | http://desktop-linux.org/forum/bittorrent-client-transmission-t44.html |
Just for some consistency
Edit: One thing that irks me about Amarok in the default theme is having to turn my head sideways to read the panel names lol
Also, would we be able to customise Amarok so that users do not have to go through that annoying "which database would you like to use? MySQL, SQLite, etc" because our target audience (average desktop users) would have no clue about these things.
Oh and people converting from Linux will have no idea about Linux directory structures so when asked to located their music (especially if it is mounted as NTFS under /media) will have troubles Perhaps we could implement a music search wizard or similar?
Thanks _________________ --SamFisher47
Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html
Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
master_kernel Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Amarok is good for KDE, but what about Gnome? I know that Banshee and Rhythmbox are very user-friendly, not to mention the extensions that you can install for each. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Siberian Fox Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Amarok runs well on Gnome too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davmont Beta Developer


Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 53 Location: Valladolid, Espaņa
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i used rhythmbox in gnome... and its really nice... now i cant live without amarok...
for kde i think amarok, but for gnome, maybe rhythmbox is better _________________ Computers are like air conditioners; they stop working properly if you open Windows  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Siberian Fox Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lol, I know what you mean. It's sort of funny, people leave Windows because of security, customizing, etc, and I left entirely for Amarok . Anyways, I suppose Rythembox will be best for Gnome as default. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rustybronco Newbie

Joined: 07 Nov 2007 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Amarok is the best music player going imho, don't know if its because of ubuntu or not' but it defaults to sqlite and tells you that it is acceptable to leave it that way then searches for installed music libraries.
I think it should be a default install in kde and gnome |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
master_kernel Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Is Amarok fully compatible with Gnome? It seems more KDE-like. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Siberian Fox Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It was designed for KDE, but it runs well on Gnome. I have never had it crash there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yatt Newbie

Joined: 08 Nov 2007 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I fully support Amarok on KDE.
I would use Exaile on Gnome. It is quite similar to Amarok, but is GTK. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
master_kernel Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| master_kernel wrote: | | Is Amarok fully compatible with Gnome? It seems more KDE-like. |
Yeah, sorry that was a duplicate question.
I've used Amarok before, and it seemed great. The only problem was that it didn't support my mp3 player. But that was a long time ago, so it probably does now. Maybe it should be included in both KDE and Gnome, but I'm not sure if it should be Gnome's default. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Siberian Fox Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Amarok's new version updated a lot of their mp3 players. Also, it wouldn't be default. It would be an officially supported add-on, instead of requiring you to install the RPM manually (or DEB). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crashdisk Alpha Project


Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Posts: 11 Location: France/Nice
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Audacious is very nice too, you can use theme from winamp on it. I prefer it and i tried the other you speek about here.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|