Desktop Linux Forum Index Desktop Linux
A New Linux In Development
 
   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  |  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups Log inLog in   RegisterRegister 

Multimedia Codecs

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Desktop Linux Forum Index -> Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
master_kernel
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 66

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:55 am    Post subject: Multimedia Codecs Reply with quote

The big question: What codecs to include in this distribution, if any.

Some codecs are illegal in the U.S. because they are copyrighted. For this reason, Ubuntu classifies non-free codecs as "dirty" and "ugly". However, these codecs allow people to play some of the most popular multimedia out there (i.e. mp3, dvds, etc.)

Please post your opinion on this topic.

master_kernel
_________________
master_kernel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SamFisher47
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 193
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think we should create two distro releases: one with and one without the copyrighted/illegal codecs. Many people are annoyed at not having out-of-the-box DVD playback and mp3 playback on Ubuntu, so perhaps give the user the choice to download a distro with or without the appropriate codecs. That means we are not infringing any copyright provided we put up a notice saying that 'downloading this iso file may infringe upon certain codec copyrights in your country. Please check your country's stance on the use of these codecs.'

Is that good?
_________________
--SamFisher47

Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html

Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Siberian Fox
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 251
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here in the USA,I can legally download the new OpenSuse 10.3 with MP3 support not enabled by default, but when playing mp3s I just hit install codec. I suppose we can use that.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
master_kernel
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 66

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SamFisher47 wrote:
I think we should create two distro releases: one with and one without the copyrighted/illegal codecs. Many people are annoyed at not having out-of-the-box DVD playback and mp3 playback on Ubuntu, so perhaps give the user the choice to download a distro with or without the appropriate codecs. That means we are not infringing any copyright provided we put up a notice saying that 'downloading this iso file may infringe upon certain codec copyrights in your country. Please check your country's stance on the use of these codecs.'

Is that good?


That's pretty good. The only problem with that is that legally, we would still get blamed if they use illegal codecs. We could probably rephrase that to say, "This distribution/ISO file contains proprietary codecs that may infringe on certain copyrights in your country. By downloading this file, you agree to accept the consequences that may follow by downloading copyrighted material. Desktop Linux claims no liability for it's users."

Something like that. Feel free to rephrase.


master_kernel
_________________
master_kernel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SamFisher47
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 193
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, I think that sounds good, master_kernel
_________________
--SamFisher47

Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html

Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Siberian Fox
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 251
Location: Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It sounds great!
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
AndrewTheArt
Alpha Project
Alpha Project


Joined: 29 Oct 2007
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is it just me or does it make a lot more sense to simply have an option to install the codecs or not within one distribution? A simple message along the lines of the one above (mentioning the liabilities) would be more efficient, save us time in producing a whole separate ISO, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Desktop Linux Forum Index -> Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum