| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SamFisher47 Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: LFS Project Problem |
|
|
Currently, my LFS system does not boot. After building and creating the appropriate /etc/fstab and setting up GRUB appropriately, the LFS system boots and a 'Kernel Panic: Could not mount root fs' occurs. Any help would be appreciated! _________________ --SamFisher47
Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html
Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Siberian Fox Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not exactly sure how to go about fixing it, but kernel panics are usually fatal. It might be impossible to fix. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sorivenul Alpha Project


Joined: 13 Nov 2007 Posts: 41 Location: SoDak, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zirconium Alpha Project

Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 29 Location: QLD, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think for a plan b we should base off of Ubuntu Feisty Fawn, seems more stable than Gutsy Gibbon to me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Siberian Fox Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
True, if it comes to that, we should use that instead. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sorivenul Alpha Project


Joined: 13 Nov 2007 Posts: 41 Location: SoDak, USA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If we base off Ubuntu, which I personally would prefer not to, we should at least base off Dapper, which is a LTS release. When testing I've had problems from Feisty and Gutsy, but will test again when Hardy is released in April. It may be easier to start from Debian Etch, stable release and not all of the Ubuntu customizations added onto it already. Just my two cents... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CartoonFan555 Newbie

Joined: 08 Nov 2007 Posts: 7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SamFisher47 Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it said root fs could not be found on /dev/sdb3 (which is the partition on which I built LFS). I have also tried /dev/hdb3, and tried different SCSI driver options when building the kernel, to no avail. I am tempted to either give up on LFS and start using Ubuntu or ArchLinux, redownload the LiveCD, or just try again.
I think I will redownload the LiveCD and then try one more time, after removing all partitions other than that of LFS, so there is no mistake about which partition to boot from. I will keep you updated!  _________________ --SamFisher47
Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html
Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CartoonFan555 Newbie

Joined: 08 Nov 2007 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I looked around and found a similar problem involving a SATA hard drive. Does your hard drive use SATA? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sorivenul Alpha Project


Joined: 13 Nov 2007 Posts: 41 Location: SoDak, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Keep us updated Sam. If the new build doesn't work my vote, as previously stated goes for starting from Arch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SamFisher47 Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good news! I downloaded the LFS LiveCD and am using that instead of Ubuntu. It is version 6.2-5 (stable release), so it does not follow LFS Book version 6.3 since the LiveCD is generally one release behind the book (LFS LiveCD 6.3 is still in testing).
Instead of manually compiling each and every package myself, I am using jhalfs, the automated LFS build script, so the computer I have dedicated to building LFS is running 24/7 continuously compiling and installing without my constant supervision. This means that LFS will be completed more quickly than I could, and since it works off the book's XML source, it follows it literally to the letter, removing any room for errors.
I will keep you updated on its progress and when it is completed, I will post an announcement here!
Thanks for all your patience, and I hope you have had a wonderful holiday so far! _________________ --SamFisher47
Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html
Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davmont Beta Developer


Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 53 Location: Valladolid, Espaņa
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
i got that error about root fs when i compiled 2.6.2* and after formatting the distro (for a problem with another os and other things) it worked perfectly...
and maybe its about : 1- sata/ide drivers
2- ext2/ext3... drivers... (i think in some cases i compiled the kernel and didnt take that option accidentally, and it didnt work)
Ah, and i would rather take debian than ubuntu if you use a "base distro"
i just dont like ubuntu (i had some problems with it when trying to install it on my girlfriend's laptop) _________________ Computers are like air conditioners; they stop working properly if you open Windows  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|