| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Siberian Fox Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:04 pm Post subject: Konqueror or Firefox |
|
|
| Which of these to do you guys like best? They will both be included in the KDE version (actually Dolphin will lol), but which do you guys use most often? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SamFisher47 Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Siberian Fox Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Never heard of those, but it is a good idea to offer alternative ones. We should include them as optional installations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SamFisher47 Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, well they are pretty much just optimised builds of Firefox, for different CPUs, etc. So we should include Swiftweasel in a 64-bit build. I think Iceweasel aims to only include free plugins or something, and it removes the Firefox-branded artwork. _________________ --SamFisher47
Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html
Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davmont Beta Developer


Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 53 Location: Valladolid, Espaņa
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SamFisher47 wrote: | | Yes, well they are pretty much just optimised builds of Firefox, for different CPUs, etc. So we should include Swiftweasel in a 64-bit build. I think Iceweasel aims to only include free plugins or something, and it removes the Firefox-branded artwork. |
iceweasel is the firefox version from debian, because a problem of licenses they changed the name... its the same as firefox, and uses the same extensions and whatever, but changes the name and icons, which were not free...
i use konqueror, just for integration with kde...it seems to be lighter than firefox, and i use kget with it... _________________ Computers are like air conditioners; they stop working properly if you open Windows  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SamFisher47 Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting Davmont. I was personally leaning towards Firefox or one of its child projects for KDE and Gnome just because many users are familiar with it, but if Konqueror is better/easier/more usable, then it should be default for the KDE version _________________ --SamFisher47
Watch our progress in LFS: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/lfs-project-status-monitor-t113.html
Interested in contributing to a developing Desktop Linux Project? Skilled in coding, developing Linux distributions, art, website design?
Tell us: http://desktop-linux.org/forum/how-can-you-help-t4.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Siberian Fox Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 251 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Konquerer is default in all distros (because it is a file manager), but Firefox is the default web browser. Also, just noted: Dolphin will replace Konquerer in KDE 4, so we will have to compare that to Firefox when the time comes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SamFisher47 Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
master_kernel Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I use Firefox, and when I used to use KDE, I used Konqueror. These should be fine in the distribution. Now comes the question of SwiftWeasel (SwiftFox now has a bad reputation; they were not concerned about open source): should it at least be in the repositories? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SamFisher47 Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scott Newbie

Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dolphin is a file manager only. It isn't a web browser. Konqueror will still be present in KDE 4 as both a file manager and web browser. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Johan Newbie

Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 7 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I go for Iceweasel/Firefox/Opera |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davmont Beta Developer


Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 53 Location: Valladolid, Espaņa
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
konqueror/firefox/opera
i use konqueror as i use kde and use kget to manage my downloads...
but iceweasel/firefox is nice because extensions and all that stuff... _________________ Computers are like air conditioners; they stop working properly if you open Windows  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|